(see also Chps. 7 and 8 in The Rhetoric of Economics [2nd ed, 1998]
and Chp. 2 in The Vices of Economists; The Virtues of the Bourgeoisie [1996])
[68] ”The
Loss Function Has Been Mislaid: The Rhetoric of Significance Tests,”
American Economic Review, Supplement 75 (2, May 1985): 201-205.
[132] “Why Economic Historians Should Stop Relying on Statistical Tests
of Significance, and Lead Economists and Historians into the Promised Land,”
Newsletter of the Cliometric Society. 2 (2, Nov 1986): 5-7.
[141] “Rhetoric Within the Citadel: Statistics,” pp. 485-490
in J.W. Wenzel at al., eds., Argument and Critical Practice: Proceedings of
the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (Annandale, Va.: Speech Communication
Association, 1987); reprinted in C. A. Willard and G. T. Goodnight, eds., Public
Argument and Scientific Understanding (1993).
[156,2] “The Bankruptcy of Statistical Significance,” Eastern Economic
Journal 18 (Summer 1992): 359-361 (also in Other Brief Academic Items,
[156] (2) below).
[88] “The Art of Forecasting, Ancient to Modern Times,” Cato
Journal 12 (1, Spring/Summer 1992): 23-43.
[213] “The Insignificance of Statistical Significance,”
Scientific American (Apr 1995): 32-33.
[184] [with Stephen Ziliak] “The
Standard Error of Regression.” Journal of Economic Literature,
Mar 1996: pp. 97-114.
[239] “Aunt Deirdre’s Letter to a Graduate Student” Eastern Economic
Journal 23 (2, Spring 1997): 241-244.
"Cassandra’s Open Letter to Her Economist Colleagues” Eastern
Economic Journal 25 (3, Summer 1999):
[239] “Two Vices: Proof and Significance,” unplublished paper presented
at the AEA session in Chicago, Jan 3, 1998.
"Beyond Merely Statistical Significance." Statement of editorial
policy, Feminist Economics, forthcoming, 2000.""