Statement: Research on peer review, the publication
process, user studies, electronic access, and survey design.
Recent publications:
Wiberly SE Jr., Hurd JM, Weller AC. Publication Patterns of U.S. Academic
Librarians from 1998 to 2002. College and Research Libraries. 67(3): May
2006
Scherrer CS, Dorsch JL, Weller AC. An evaluation of a collaborative model
for preparing evidence-based medicine teachers. Journal of the Medical
Library Association. 94(2):159-65, April 2006.
Weller, AC. Electronic scientific information, open access, and editorial
peer review: changes on the horizon? Science & Technology Libraries
26(1):89-108, 2005.
Weller, AC. Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for
comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports.
Journal of the Medical Library Association. 92(2):163, April 2004.
Hurd JM, Weller AC. Evolving electronic journals: accomplishment and
challenges. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries.
1(1):31-49, 2004
Brennan MJ, Hurd JM, Blecic BD, and Weller AC. A snapshot
of early adopters of e-journals: challenges to the library. College and
Research Libraries 63(6):515-26, November, 2002.
Weller, AC. Qualitativeand quantitative measures of indexed health
sciences electronic journals. JAMA 287(21):2865-6, 2002 June 5.
Weller, AC. Academy points increased for research activities. MLA News.
No. 341:11, November/December 2001.
Weller, AC. Letter: Peer review is essential for both print and electronic
publications. MedGenMed, November 14, 2001.
http://www.medscape.com/Medscape/GeneralMedicine/journal/public/mgm.journal.html
Weller, AC. Editorial Peer Review: do studies prove its effectiveness? The
Scientist 15(21):39, October 29, 2001.
Monograph: Weller AC. Editorial peer review: its strengths and weaknesses.
Medford, N.J: Information Today, Inc., 2001.
