[37] “The
Enclosure of Open Fields: Preface to a Study of Its Impact on the Efficiency
of English Agriculture in the Eighteenth Century,” Journal of
Economic History 32 (1, Mar, 1972): 15-35.
[105] “Review of Williams' Draining of the Somerset Levels,” Journal
of Economic History 32 (4, Dec, 1972): 1021-23.
[38] “The Persistence of English Common Fields,” in E.L. Jones and
William Parker (eds.), European Peasants and Their Markets: Essays in Agrarian
Economic History (Princeton University Press, 1975), pp. 73-119.
[39] “The Economics of Enclosure: A Market Analysis,” in Jones and
Parker, as cited, pp. 123-160.
[40] “English Open Fields as Behavior Towards Risk,” Research in Economic
History 1 (Fall 1976): 124-170.
[41] “Fenoaltea on Open Fields: A Comment,” Explorations in Economic
History 14 (Oct 1977): 402-404.
[42] “A Reply to Professor Charles Wilson,” Journal of European Economic
History 8 (Spring 1979): 203-207.
[43] “Another Way of Observing Open Fields: A Reply to A.R.H. Baker,”
Journal of Historical Geography 5 (Oct 1979): 427, 427-29.
[127] “Scattering in Open Fields: A Comment on Michael Mazur's Article,”
Journal of European Economic History 9 (Spring, 1980): 209-214.
[115] “Review of Popkin's The Rational Peasant and Macfarlane's The
Origins of English Individualism,” Journal of Political Economy,
89 (August 1981): 837-40 [reprinted in UCLA Writing Program {Ellen Strenski,
ed., Cross-Disciplinary Conversations about Writing (NY: St. Martin's Press,
1989)].
[129] “Comment on Petras and Havens' 'Peasant Behavior and Social Change--Cooperatives
and Individual Holdings.'“ Pp. 226-231 in Clifford S. Russell and
N.K. Nicholson, eds. Public Choice and Rural Development, Washington,
D.C., 1981.
[44] “Theses on Enclosure,” pp. 56-72 in Papers Presented to the Economic
History Society Conference at Canterbury, 1983. Agricultural History Society.
[45] [with John Nash] “Corn
at Interest: The Extent and Cost of Grain Storage in Medieval England,”
American Economic Review 74 (Mar 1984): 174-187.
[46] (a.) “Conditional Economic History: A Reply to Komlos and Landes,”
Economic History Review 44 (1, Feb 1991): 128-132.
[191] “Review of Turner's, English Enclosures,”Journal of Economic
History 1982
[134] “Open Field System,” brief entry in Eatwell, Milgate, and Newman,
eds. The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economic Thought and Doctrine (Macmillan
U.K., 1987).
[47] “The Open Fields of England: Rent, Risk, and the Rate of Interest,
1300-1815,” in David W. Galenson, ed., Markets in History: Economic Studies
of the Past (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 5-51.
[48] “The
Prudent Peasant: New Findings on Open Fields.” Journal
of Economic History 51 (2, June 1991): 343-355.
[48a.] {“Allen's Enclosure and the Yeoman: The View from Tory Fundamentalism.”}
{{Other draft chapters in a book, The Prudent Peasant}}