Go Back

9. Invited replies to reviews of The Rhetoric of Economics and other rhetorical works

[93] “The Two Cultures and Methodology [A Reply to Mark Blaug],” Critical Review 1 (3, Summer 1987): 124-127.
 
[94] “Responses to My Critics: A Mild Response to William Butos; An Agreeable Reply to A.W. Coats; A Disagreeable Reply to Steven Pressman,” Eastern Economic Journal  13 (July-Sept 1987): 308-311.
 
[95] “Two Replies and a Dialogue on the Rhetoric of Economics” [: Rosenberg, Rappaport, and Mäki] Economics and Philosophy  4 (1988): 150-166.
 
[96] “Rhetoric as Morally Radical: Reply to Klamer, Stewart, and Gleicher,”  Review of Radical Political Economy 19 (3): 87-91.  Translated into Spanish, Estudios Economicos [El Colegio de Mexico].
 
[97] “Splenetic Rationalism: Hoppe's Review of Chapter 1 of The Rhetoric of Economics.”  Market Process  7 (1) (Spring 1989): 34-41, reprinted in Peter J. Boettke and David L. Prychitdo, eds. The Market Process: Essays on Contemporary Austrian Economics  (Edward Elgar, 1994) pp. 187-200.
 
[98] “Commentary [on Rossetti and Mirowski].”  Pp. 261-271 in Neil de Mari, ed. Post-Popperian Methodology of Economics.  Recovering Practice.  Boston: Kluwer, 1992.
 
[99] “Reply to Munz,” Journal of the History of Ideas  51 (1, Jan/Mar 1990): 143-147.
 
[99a] “Modern Epistemology Against Analytic Philosphy: A Reply to Mäki,” Journal of Economic Literature 33 (Sept, 1995): 1319-1323.
 
[217] “Review of Mirowski’s Natural Images in Economic Thought: ‘Markets Read in Tooth and Claw’,” Isis, 1996.