The
History of Counter-current Technology - From CCD to EECCC
Overview
- Countercurrent
Distribution Development
- DCCC (Droplet
CCC)
- CPC (Centrifugal
Partition Chromatography)
- HSCCC (High Speed
CCC)
- EECCC (Elution
Extrusion CCC)
- Advantages of
CCC
|
|
Introduction
Let’s start
at the beginning…
In order to understand partition chromatography, one must first understand
partitioning (liquid-liquid extraction). Partitioning has three stages:
- Mixing - Thoroughly
mix the two phases
- Settling - Allow
the mixture to settle into two phases
- Separating - Separate
the phases from each other
The physiochemical
property that allows compounds to be separated through partitioning is
called the Partition coefficient (K). This is defined as the concentration
(C) of a compound in the upper phase of a specific specific two-phase
solvent system divided by the concentration of the compound in the lower
phase of the same two-phase solvent system (C[upper]/C[lower]).
- Advancements in
strumentation are driven by improving partitioning efficiency!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counter-current
Distribution
In the 1940s Lyman
C. Craig invented the first apparatus (besides a separation funnel!)
to conduct counter-current partitioning; he called this Countercurrent
Distribution (CCD). Shown here is an apparatus built by Hecker (Tuebingen,
Germany) that allowed manual CCD of samples. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Droplet
CCC (DCCC)
The concept: One
phase drips through the second phase, in ascending (upper
phase = mobile) or descending mode (lower phase = mobile).
- Low flow rate
(relies on gravity) makes DCCC a time consuming separation method
- Drawback: relatively
poor mixing leads to reduced separation efficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Centrifugal
Partition Chromatography (CPC)
Basically, CPC is
hydrostatic like DCCC, but with improved mixing and more
theoretical plates
- Spinning rotor
- Centrifugal field
vs. gravitational field to hold one phase stationary
- Still “hydrostatic”
separation – constant g-field
- One axis of gyration
- Much faster separations
than in DCCC (flowrates ca. 100-fold higher, FCPC)
Literature
Murayama, W. et al.,
J. Chromatogr., 239, 643-649 (1982)
Links
http://www.richardscientific.com/fcpc.htm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
Speed CCC (HSCCC)
- Yoichiro Ito (NIH,
Bethesda, MD) developed planetary, centrifugal CCC
- “Increases
gravity” – improves mixing - created hydrodynamic
equilibrium
- Theoretically thousands
(up to 70,000 per hour) partitioning/chromatographic steps
- Mixing, Settling,
Separating
To help understand
how this works…
- HSCCC Movie...coming
soon
- note – planetary
motion of coils, pink is mixing zone
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elution
Extrusion CCC (EECCC)
- Co-developed by
Alain Berthod (Univ Lyon, Villeurbanne, France) et al.
- Technique utilizing
modern HSCCC
- Concept: Extrude
"column" after certain K value
- Allows high
resolution of significantly larger range of K values in a given
time
Advantages of CCC
- Quick
(high throughput in preparative separation)
- Inexpensive
(only solvent costs, which still are significantly lower than in HPLC)
- Gentle
and versatile,
for separation of varied compounds, with less chance of decomposition
- Able to range
from milligrams to tens of grams on the same instrument
- Able to switch
between normal and reversed-phase at will
- Free of
irreversible adsorption
to a solid support (100% recovery of sample)
Literature
Armbruster, J. et
al. Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technology 24, 1827-1840
(2001).
Alvi, K. A. Journal
of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies 24, 1765-1773 (2001). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|