Safety and Sobriety:
Best Practices in Domestic Violence and Substance Abuse
In December 1997, the Bureau of Domestic Violence Prevention & Intervention
of the Illinois Department of Human Services convened an advisory group
to discuss the frequently co-occurring problems of domestic violence and
substance abuse. The 30 members of the Domestic Violence-Substance Abuse
Interdisciplinary Task Force were drawn from the domestic violence
and substance abuse practice and policy communities, academia, and government,
including the DHS Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse.
In conjunction with the Illinois Family Violence Coordinating Council,
and with the support of the Illinois Violence Prevention Authority, Illinois
Department of Human Services, Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence,
Illinois Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Professional Certification Association,
and a number of private sponsors, the first Better Practices in Substance
Abuse and Domestic Violence conference convened in Bloomington in May
1998. This conference succeeded beyond anyone's expectations, drawing nearly
400 participants from across the spectrum of service providers and policy
makers in the state. In June 1999, the second Best Practices conference
was held in Springfield. The theme of that conference, and the title of
this manual - Safety and Sobriety - was drawn from a keynote address by
Theresa Zubretsky.
The task force has met for the past two years. While there are few
areas where the task force could reach a true consensus, there are some
key points about which we do agree:
The document you are reading was conceptualized as a brief, hands-on,
Illinois-specific tool for use by substance abuse professionals, the domestic
violence community, and workers in other areas such as criminal justice,
child welfare, and public assistance. The core sections of the document
target four populations defined by the settings where they would first
be encountered: (1) men in batterers' intervention programs, (2) men in
substance abuse treatment programs, (3) women in domestic violence victim
programs, and (4) women in substance abuse treatment. The task force believes
these four settings -- in addition to criminal justice, child protection,
and public assistance -- are the settings where the confluence between
substance abuse and domestic violence can be most effectively addressed.
Sections are added to address populations (cultural minorities, gays, and
lesbians) and settings (child welfare, public assistance, and criminal
justice) that could not be adequately addressed in the main sections.
This is only one of many ways to organize a document such as this, and
we make no claim to it being the best way. Each of the four sections is
designed for staff working in one of those settings. For example, the section
on women in substance abuse programs targets addiction counselors working
with women's treatment programs. The section assumes that addiction counselors
do not need education in addictions, but are likely to need information
about domestic violence. Specifically, they may need to learn about domestic
violence as it affects practice with women currently receiving addiction
treatment. The other three sections follow a similar pattern, targeting
staff in batterers' intervention programs, addiction counselors in men's
treatment programs, and domestic violence advocates.
There are a few things the reader should know about this document. First,
it is not designed to be read cover-to-cover like a book. We believe the
best way to use the document is to select the section best corresponding
to the type of setting in which you work, then to read other sections as
interest directs. Second, the document was developed by individuals working
in a committee. Consequently, it has all the advantages and disadvantages
of committee products. On the one hand, it lacks a single voice and may
at times appear uneven or disjointed. On the other hand, it reflects a
much broader base of opinion than most material you can read in this area.
There are parts of the document which contradict other parts of the document.
These contradictions reflect the disagreements between knowledgeable practitioners
within and between their respective fields. Finally, where research exists
to support a perspective, it is reflected in the document. However, there
is little actual research to support practice in this area, so we depend
heavily on the experience of practitioners to fill the knowledge gaps.
On behalf of the Domestic Violence-Substance Abuse Interdisciplinary
Task Force, I welcome readers to join and contribute to the movement to
link the domestic violence and substance abuse fields in a way that will
enhance the safety and sobriety of the people who look to us for help.
Larry W. Bennett, Ph.D.
University of Illinois at Chicago
-vi-
Note: The opinions expressed in this document are those of the Illinois Domestic Violence-Substance Abuse Interdisciplinary Task Force, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or positions of the Illinois Department of Human Services or any of its constituent offices, bureaus, or programs. This document is not intended as legal advice and programs should consult with their own attorneys on all such matters.